Monday Morning Music Ministry

Start Your Week with a Spiritual Song in Your Heart

No Man Can Tame the Tongue

How many terrorist victims were there in the attack on Charlie Hebdo’s Paris offices this morning? Before you scramble for the latest numbers, the answer is: None.

Cartoonists, writers, and security people were murder victims, not terrorism victims. The distinction is important. The victims of terrorism are citizens of Paris; Christians, Jews, and secularists throughout Paris, France, Europe, and the West; and cartoonists, satirists, thinking people.

Never again, at least for years to come, will average people be able to think skeptically, critically, humorously, even heretically, without looking over our shoulders even in some small way. That is the definition of terrorism, to instill fear and alter our lives.

Charlie Hebdo (Weekly) is a newspaper that is the second incarnation of the comics magazine Charlie Mensuel (Monthly), a magazine named in honor of Charlie Brown. Its original version was satirical but also a reprint vehicle for comic strips, including from the U.S., in the manner of Linus, Tintin, and other character-named European monthlies. In its current version it is aggressively left-wing and had been the object of arson attacks, government censorship, and concomitant success as a humorous, iconoclastic institution.

As a former cartoonist and a publisher and writer who has worked with the European comics industry, I knew two of the cartoonists who were murdered in the Charlie Hebdo offices, Georges Wolinski and Jean Cabut. Amiable fellows — more than amiable; like most cartoonists, personally merry and friendly — they were left-wing and perhaps a bit nihilist. They, and their paper, were equal-opportunity intellectual anarchists: all religions received savage treatment. There were far more attacks on Christianity than on Islam; many more personal and insulting depictions of clergy, and of Mary, God, and Jesus.

This is not to excuse or mischaracterize their work; they never asked for nor expected such defense. Wolinski also scripted a series of pornographic comics, so I seldom was in sympathy with any of their work. Properly regarding satire as free speech; that is, written words and drawings are as of spoken words, we remember that James 3:8 says, “The tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.”

When the Bible tells us that, it is a warning to devout believers, but also a key to discerning the nature of attacks, harmful speech, and even satire. But after millennia of investing in, and living in, democratic cultures, we are also committed to the dictum misattributed to Voltaire: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

Liberals and conservatives are quick to quote Voltaire, but often are absent when push comes to shove. Radio’s Michael Savage was banned from travel to the United Kingdom because he called terrorists “Islamo-Fascists.” Not only did the federal government fail to protest, but fellow conservatives, especially the prominent in media, were relatively silent about his case. The British historian David Irving has told me about his incarceration in solitary confinement for two years in Austria because he entered the country years after he spoke there, questioning not the fact but the numbers of people slaughtered during World War II. No governments and few fellow historians protested the violation of free speech, freedom of opinion, in his case. In countries like Canada, Australia, and Germany it is against the law to voice opinions on this subject; yet the West deplores Muslim objections to criticism of the Prophet.

Nativists, xenophobes, and cultural traditionalists have been rising in Europe in recent years. In Austria and Germany (some would say, predictably) but also in countries like Switzerland, France, the Netherlands, and Denmark. We see rallies, movements, and laws that are anti-immigrant and, because of the statistics, less religious-oriented than economic, social, and cultural.

In a perfect world, Christians would not mirror the intolerance of Muslim extremists. In a perfect world we would reach the lost, convert them by love, and work toward St. Augustine’s “City of God” wherein few are motivated to commit such acts.

We are called to love, but embracing suicide, even cultural suicide by a thousand accelerating concessions and surrenders, cannot be so described.

Thanks Giving and Receiving

Every year at this time, besides focusing my gratitude to God for His blessings, the philologist in me unavoidably reflects on our use of “Thanks” in our culture. Specifically I have noticed that the response we all were taught, when someone says, “Thank you,” has fallen into disuse.

Most of us were taught “Please,” “Thank you,” and “You’re Welcome,” as strictly as ABCs and 1-2-3s. I do a little private survey each year to see how “You’re Welcome” is becoming an extinct phrase. Try it yourself.

Over the past week, in shops, post offices, and banks, I tracked 24 times I said “Thank you.” I received only one “You’re Welcome” in reply. Among the substitutes were “Yup,” “OK,” “No problem,” “Hey, no prob,” “You got it,”  “Sure thing,” and “You bet.” The most common reply was “Thank YOU.”

I always cast broader attention across the cultural landscape, to radio and television. Of 17 examples I recorded, I heard one person, correspondent Malini Wilkes, of FOX News, say “You’re Welcome.” The speakers ranged from major news figures on NPR to callers and hosts on sports radio WFAN in New York. Also celebrities from my notebook since last Thanksgiving (once you notice this, it’s hard to stop noticing):

In July, President Obama was interviewed by Yonit Levi of Israeli TV:

      Q: President Barack Obama, shalom, and thank you so much for talking with us today.

      The President: Thank you. Thank you very much.

And at the end of this interview:

      Q: Thank you so much, Mr. President.

      The President: Thank you. I enjoyed it. Take care.

Things were not different when, a few months earlier, Obama was interviewed by the pan-Arabic media site Al Arabiya:

    Q: Mr. President, thank you for this opportunity, we really appreciate it
    The President: Thank you so much.

And at the end of the interview, it sounded like Alphonse and Gaston had entered the studio:

    Q: Sir, I really appreciate it.
    The President: Thank you so much.
    Q: Thanks a lot.
    The President: I appreciate it.
    Q: Thank you.
    The President: Thank you   

Pat Boone was a guest on “The Interview” program from NHK television in Japan.

      Q: Pat, thanks for joining us today.

      Pat Boone: I enjoyed it.

One of the Republican “young guns” in the House turned the tables in the conclusion of an CNBC interview; he thanked his host, Joe Kernan, first:

      Rep. Tim Ryan: Thank you.

      Interviewer: OK, Congressman.

Laura Bush, flogging her book, not only abandoned the traditional reply, but the first person pronoun, once a no-no for a school librarian:

      Maria Bartiromo: Mrs. Bush, thank you so much for your time today.

      Mrs Bush: Thanks.

      Bartiromo: Thank you for the service for our country, of course.

      Mrs Bush: Thanks a lot. Appreciate it.

The funereal Charlie Rose found a way to avoid his conversation-partner getting the last word, at least when that would mirror his own thanks:

      Charlie Rose: It’s a pleasure to have you here in New York. Thank you very much.

      Eric Schmidt: Thank you very much.

      Charlie Rose: Eric Schmidt, the CEO of Google.

Sarah Palin, typically, shakes things up. When she is welcomed, she thanks.

      Chris Wallace, FOX News Host: Governor Palin, welcome to Fox News Sunday.

      Sarah Palin: Thank you so much.

The origins of “Thank you” and “You are welcome” are interesting. According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the Proto Indo-European group spoke a cognate of “thanks,” meaning “Good thoughts, gratitude,” the same root as “think.” Old Frisians said “thankia,” Germans say, “Danke.”

The roots of “welcome” are not, strictly, “well” and “come,” but “willed” as in desired; and “Cuma,” meaning guest – so, roughly, “ I want to extend my hospitality to you.” Oddly, “You’re welcome” as a formulaic response to “Thank you” only became standard around 1907. So if this social convention is fading from the scene, we are not losing an old tradition, but a relatively brief convention.

What is the lesson to be drawn this week? Is there a spiritual aspect to this discussion? Thank you for asking.

Whether we recall biblical ceremonies, Pilgrims’ dinners, or presidential proclamations, we summon feelings of gratitude to a gracious God, so as to be mindful of His bountiful gifts at Thanksgiving time.

Too often, however, we forget that God, Creator of the universe and Master of the Harvest, thanks us, too. There are many cases in the Bible where we see this – “Well done, thou good and faithful servant” is the most familiar. He knows what our service means, and what it costs, and He honors our faith and our witness. This is humbling (He exercises grace, lest no man shall boast) – but edifying, because it reminds us that Thanksgiving is a time of blessed sweet communion.

When God says, “Thank you,” let us not reply with “No prob,” or “OK.” Be intentional with, “No, thank YOU,” or “I want to extend my hospitality to you.” And how appropriate, how symbolic, if we have room to set an empty chair at our Thanskgiving dinners, representing the fact that we can commune with the God who offers, and receives, Thanks.

Here is a brief song and video that will affect you profoundly —

Click:  Thank You For Giving To the Lord

I also give thanks for creative people whose faith has touched us in the past. There are cases where songwriters and singers – even preachers – alter their Christian views and sometimes deny their Christian vows; yet the works produced during their periods of faith still proclaim the truth. Moreover, we cannot judge, especially when their testimony was strong and they, perhaps, wrestle now with spiritual matters. For instance, if Mel Gibson has disappointed believers with actions in his private life since “Passion of the Christ,” few would deny the truth and power of that film. We gave thanks, and add to our prayers sinners such as we.

 

Who Moved?

Who is the person closest to you in life? Quick!

Sort of a trick question, because we should answer “Jesus,” but many of us think of family, spouses, friends; and great relationships should indeed spring to mind.

But Jesus is the answer to that question… even if people don’t feel like putting Him first on the list. Because He is always there, close to us. Closer than a shadow.

George Beverly Shea once told me a story that stuck with me (I can’t claim credit for such a great story with its deeper lesson!). An old farmer was driving his wife to town in their car. The wife looked across to her husband behind the wheel and said, “You know, when we were courting, we used to sit so close together in the front seat!” He looked over at her, and at the space between them, and asked, “Who moved?”

Of course the meaning is that sometimes we feel not as close to God as we used to. Sometimes the zeal of our young faith subsides; sometimes a crisis in our lives affects the intimacy we once had with God; sometimes doubts make God seem distant to us.

… but our cooling faith, our crises, our doubts do not place God at a distance. He will never leave us nor forsake us. Only we can make ourselves feel distant from Him.

So don’t “move” away from God, and then blame it on Him. Neither need we toss Him the wheel of the car, jump in His lap, or check off boxes on a list. Just invite Him: Abide With Me.

The simple words of this simple hymn are basically all He asks of us. Trust and rely on Jesus, feel His presence. And know what the invitation means: Abide means to dwell (the word is related to “abode”), to stay, to continue, to wait patiently, to accept, to endure, to support, to live… within you.

Who moves apart? Never the Lord!

Here is a moving performance of that simple and mighty hymn by one of the world’s most beautiful voices, Hayley Westenra of New Zealand. If you can listen with earphones, treat yourself.

Click:  Abide With Me

Welcome to MMMM!

A site for sore hearts -- spiritual encouragement, insights, the Word, and great music!

categories

Archives

About The Author

... Rick Marschall is the author of 74 books and hundreds of magazine articles in many fields, from popular culture (Bostonia magazine called him "perhaps America's foremost authority on popular culture") to history and criticism; country music; television history; biography; and children's books. He is a former political cartoonist, editor of Marvel Comics, and writer for Disney comics. For 20 years he has been active in the Christian field, writing devotionals and magazine articles; he was co-author of "The Secret Revealed" with Dr Jim Garlow. His biography of Johann Sebastian Bach for the “Christian Encounters” series was published by Thomas Nelson. He currently is writing a biography of the Rev Jimmy Swaggart and his cousin Jerry Lee Lewis. Read More