11-15-21<\/p>\n
Charles Dickens opened his book A Tale of Two Cities<\/em> with the famous words, \u201cIt was the best of times, it was the worst of times.\u201d William Wordsworth assayed societies\u2019 turmoils and wrote, in The Prelude<\/em>, \u201cBliss was it, in that dawn, to be alive; but to be young was very heaven!\u201d And the author of Ecclesiastes<\/em>, probably Solomon, wrote \u201cThere is nothing new under the sun,\u201d less philosophical than Dickens; and more fatalistic than Wordsworth.<\/p>\n We live in times now that are fraught with turmoil. From major power struggles around the world, \u201cwars and rumors of wars\u201d \u2013 to acrimony in Washington and even echoes of hatred and destruction in unlikely settings of school-board meetings and downtown neighborhoods.<\/p>\n Do we live today in such a zone of a dichotomy? \u2013 are these the \u201cbest of times\u201d? Well, things are generally more prosperous than in the past; literacy has increased; medicines and procedures are saving lives. These things are mostly true in our country and around the world. We have sent humans to the moon and maybe, soon, to Mars.<\/p>\n Signs of progress are all around us.<\/p>\n But what word should we apply to other \u201csigns of the times\u201d? \u2013 unrest around the world; revanchist empires; slavery and human trafficking; genocide and abuse; religious and political repression; increased drug use; divorces, suicides, and homelessness; broken homes\u2026 REgress<\/em>? Surely not progress.<\/p>\n Humankind needs a different yardstick, or a different dictionary \u2013 or a different value system \u2013 when science concocts ways to protect and prolong life\u2026 and develops means to end life before birth, and with the elderly, in advance of natural death. Governments seek life elsewhere in the universe, yet encourage the snuffing of lives in the womb. Or deny that a heartbeat in the baby is<\/em> life.<\/p>\n And so forth. \u201cVanity, vanity; all is vanity,\u201d Solomon continued in his indictment. \u201cMeaningless.\u201d<\/p>\n If we \u2013 humankind; not merely our immediate neighbors \u2013 ever are to redeem our species, what we call Civilization, it will require a revolution (or counter-revolution, actually) of our souls, our standards, our values. Values: what is<\/em> valuable to us?<\/p>\n This week I was corresponding with friend Nicole LeBlanc, a gifted pianist, who issued challenges for people to list favorite works of Beethoven in several musical genres. Next came thoughts of the reasons for our affections; and then of the interpreters of his works. I have internalized such questions, the reason why I have several recordings each of all the works of Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert. We respond to differences in instrumentation, tempi, dynamics, interpretation.<\/p>\n How can we listen to the musical miracle that was Bach, or be moved to tears by works of Mozart \u2013 who first composed at age five, and wrote supernal melodies as easily as other men perspire \u2013 and think that the world has progressed beyond them?<\/p>\n Such thoughts returned me, from a different route than beholding the spread of nihilism, to a consideration of \u201cprogress.\u201d<\/p>\n Question: Which scenario leads to greater enjoyment, richer appreciation, more satisfaction to your soul and mind: hearing Beethoven\u2019s Eroica<\/em> Symphony (or insert any great work of art) only once in your life as often was the case in centuries past; or having access to DVDs and videos by the dozens, and listening to the music several times a year, for years and years? It is a challenging question, with implications.<\/p>\n In fact, in the question we can substitute any work of art, fine wine, or travel adventure. Does saturation equate with increased enjoyment, intellectual enrichment\u2026 progress?<\/p>\n I am a free-enterprise capitalist, and I endorse democracy (like Churchill, I suppose: democracy is the worst form of government unless you consider the rest. I suppose.) Yet since I recognize that human nature is corrupt, I regret civil architectonics such as capitalism and democracy that let humankind work its will. Eventually they must produce harm.<\/p>\n Potential great artists and composers spend their careers designing advertisements and writing commercial jingles to seduce our better judgments. Their works will remain in the culture about long as the fortunes they accumulate producing the ephemeral material. Ah! Some might say that daVinci and Michelangelo also spent their lives and their talents on commercials, too \u2013 advertisements for God, commissions for the church. Is it any different?<\/p>\n Yes, is the answer; yes<\/em>.<\/p>\n We return to the question of standards and value-systems. It is<\/em> worthwhile to devote your life to an ideal; a noble truth. It is<\/em> the proper calling of humanity to praise God for the gifts He has given us\u2026 to return those gifts, in my view. We advance humankind by recognizing what is true, what is noble, what is right, what is pure, what is lovely, what is admirable. We should think about such things.<\/p>\n These things that are excellent and praiseworthy, and not selfish or short-sighted, these<\/em> things will save the earth and benefit our fellow creatures. This<\/em> is progress.<\/p>\n Finally, I return to \u201ccreativity.\u201d In so many ways we are like the animals, but\u2026 we have the spark of creativity. And that is why it is a shame to waste it on the promotion of transitory things. We are to be \u201cimitators of Christ,\u201d Thomas \u00e0 Kempis urged, writing of spiritual ways.<\/p>\n I wrote here recently that we actually cannot create anything, as God has created all, and this is a finite world: maybe we can only rearrange. Yet, in what we call creativity, we can in a way imitate God. A solemn privilege! We can imagine, we can dream, we can explain. We can take blank paper, white canvases, and rough chunks of stone\u2026 and bring forth works of art and beauty and understanding. We can not, and need not all be Beethovens. But we must, all of us, dream and \u201ccreate.\u201d<\/p>\n We too can touch souls, and change hearts. To appreciate other artists, and to translate God\u2019s profound messages and love for others through our works \u2013 and not to cheapen our talents, throw them away, or use them for selfish and hurtful ends here in the 21st century \u2013 now, that<\/em> would be progress.<\/p>\n + + +<\/p>\n Surprise! You might be expecting a passage of Baroque music or a great poem. But I am going to share a country song, one that expertly captures the essence of creativity \u2013 from loneliness to sacrifice to devotion to resonance. We can all relate! The Christian songwriter sings of the iconic 16th Avenue in Nashville, home to studios, publishing offices, and dreams. The songwriters around him relate, too, by their expressions.<\/p>\n