10-15-18<\/p>\n
A robust element of many stories in the news these days, and a subtext of many articles, particularly political stories, is the resurgence of socialism. Significantly, the church is at the center of matters. <\/p>\n
Socialism has experienced an awakening, at least in debates as its governmental structure is being somewhat dismantled. Wasn\u2019t it dead and buried after the Reagan years? Didn\u2019t the failure and overthrow of Communist regimes around the world teach people that socialism was a miserable failure? Weren\u2019t the statistics of misery, poverty, and oppression in socialist paradises enough to inform people of its toxicity? <\/p>\n
Quite the opposite. In America, anyway, it has been more than resuscitated. More than acceptable again, it is fashionable and urgently desired by broad swaths of the public and media. The Fourth Estate has become the Fifth Column, and Americans are, among other means of propaganda, \u201cguilted\u201d welcoming the socialist agenda.<\/p>\n
No less than politicians and media and wealthy foreigners and the academic-industrial complex, many contemporary church leaders \u2013 Catholic, Protestant, Jewish \u2013 are fervent cheerleaders. For neo-Marxism.<\/p>\n
My problem with Marx, Engels, and Lenin, and Left-wing Socialism is that, at essence, it is anti-Biblical. Church Marxists will argue that Jesus was the first socialist because of His dedication to equality and peace and his rebuke of the wealthy and concern for the poor. They say that His Disciples and the early Church were examples of communistic communities.<\/p>\n
Why are these viewpoints anti-Biblical? <\/p>\n
Jesus was devoted to equality\u2026 but never did He pull people down. He always lifted people up. Equality was a thing to be desired, and all are born with equal opportunities (never in history more than in non-socialist states), but Jesus made references to the real world\u2019s ambitions on one hand and charity on the other.<\/p>\n
Peace? We all know that Jesus had a temper, yes, and let His righteousness take precedence over peace as the world might define it yesterday or tomorrow. \u201cPeace I leave with you; my peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid.\u201d<\/p>\n
Jesus\u2019s attitude toward wealth? We know that He commanded to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar\u2019s; and to \u201cforsake all\u201d and spoke of the rich entering Heaven as easily as camels passing through needles\u2019 eyes. His distinction was not that \u201cmoney is the root of all evil\u201d but that \u201cthe love<\/em> of money is the root of all evil.\u201d<\/p>\n Were the early Christians prefiguring socialism in their communities of sharing? The answer is found in later, more organized Socialist states that have imploded thanks to inequality, wars and counter-revolutions, inflation, corruption, and \u2013 have you noticed? \u2013 suppression of religion.<\/p>\n In virtually every Socialist state, religion is oppressed; believers persecuted. In mild \u201cmixed\u201d socialist countries, church attendance and fealty to Scripture drastically has been diminished. <\/p>\n I think Christians should be opposed to socialism, moreover, because it is based on the state planning, state supremacy, or state control. Goods and services\u2026 economic choices\u2026 private enterprise\u2026 educational standards\u2026 prerogatives of daily life. When the population is reared on a socialist worldview, the government is assumed to be the ultimate answer to every problem, the ultimate source of every blessing, the ultimate judge of every challenge. <\/p>\n The government, not God, becomes people\u2019s go-to resource. Google the proper agency instead of praying to the Lord.<\/p>\n Major culprits \u2013 wolves in sheep\u2019s clothing \u2013 are \u201cDemocratic Socialist\u201d or \u201cChristian Democrat\u201d or Democrat parties that substitute themselves for the church. How do they attempt to supplant the church? It is not always as blatant as pre-censorship of sermon notes, as the mayor of Houston attempted a few years ago; nor the many attempts to proscribe the Bible, and public monuments and celebrations, as \u201chate speech.\u201d<\/p>\n It is more in the poisonous worldview of modern socialism: textbooks written by unelected secularists; the aspects of national health insurance that would discourage private and personal care, and force caregivers to sometimes act against their consciences.<\/p>\n The foundational aspects of the welfare state discourage (or attack) the concept so strongly commanded by Jesus that we care for one another as individuals. Massive taxes for a welfare bureaucracy allows people, or obliges them, to transfer their giving to the State \u2013 and in so doing, \u201cfree\u201d them of the Biblical necessity to care for the poor and sick. Ultimately, allowing people to stop caring about<\/em> the poor and sick.<\/p>\n I believe, as St Augustine believed and wrote, the real meaning behind \u201cthe poor you shall always have with you\u201d is not that poverty is a futilely resisted pestilence, but that we need to be aware at all times of those who hurt. For their sake, and our souls\u2019, not to check boxes on tax forms to fund some program somewhere.<\/p>\n Finally, consider: Marx spoke (supposedly) to the working class. Good at first glance?<\/p>\n But Jesus spoke to ALL. <\/p>\n + + +<\/p>\n