2-19-18<\/p>\n
Another week, another school shooting. Or so it seems; the news media and politicians recently cited 18 deaths by firearms on American school properties in the first six weeks of this year. <\/p>\n
Well, it turns out that most of those were parking-lot encounters after dark, between adults; or accidental discharges barely near schools, and so forth. Four angry, and ugly, assaults \u2013 but I am not saying \u201conly four,\u201d Any is too many.<\/p>\n
The gun issue is one of many in contemporary America where hyperbole has overtaken rationality. Everyone \u2013 I think on both, or all, sides \u2013 readily adopts exaggerations and logical extensions and, lately, personal invective, to press their points. <\/p>\n
What once was abstract is individual, and we see it in the \u201cgun debate\u201d as much as in any other area, and even among people who never encountered danger or grief. We can of course be passionate about issues without being touched personally. But I know the real root cause of our heated debates these days in America \u2013 that are more heat than debate.<\/p>\n
It is the Slippery Slope. The term in logic indicates the danger of granting one point, in fear of losing the entire argument. To open the door a crack threatens to destroy the entire house, given time. <\/p>\n
The Slippery Slope is more than a debating term. When it is used today, even when not called by name, people in effect indicate distrust of the opponent. In the gun debate, for instance, many defenders of the Second Amendment believe that any compromise will be seized upon, leading to\u2026 seizure of all firearms. \u201cGive an inch; they\u2019ll take a mile,\u201d and it did not help rational debate when a Democrat officeholder a few years ago admitted that, yes, she would not stop at each restriction.<\/p>\n
We can avoid slippery slopes by not even going near the slopes. <\/p>\n
For instance, the solution to the \u201cgun problem\u201d in America is simple.<\/p>\n
Not \u201ceasy,\u201d but simple. Questions and answers: Is it because guns are more sophisticated and deadly? Nonsense. Everything exists in the context of its time. Daggers are more convenient than dueling swords, yet there were not mass stabbings when they were readily available.<\/em><\/p>\n Speaking of knives, if the automatic reaction of many people \u2013 ban all guns \u2013 were a solution, should we look at the growing numbers of mass killings around the world by weaponized cars and trucks, and, yes again, random stabbings, and\u2026 ban cars and trucks and knives?<\/em><\/p>\n Such scenarios depend on slippery slopes, to propose and dispose\u2026 and will never lead to solutions.<\/p>\n It is self-swindling delusion to look to Washington for the answer to these problems, and almost everything, these days. \u201cWhy doesn\u2019t the president act?\u201d \u201cWhy doesn\u2019t Congress DO something?\u201d<\/p>\n Let\u2019s explain something to America: Shut up. Washington is not the answer to everything\u2026 cannot be the answer to everything\u2026 and, as often as not, is the answer to nothing; unable to have the answers. Washington is not our savior.<\/p>\n We already have a Savior. And now we are face to face with our solution. Remember, I said \u201ceasy,\u201d but not simple; not simple to make happen. Not in America, 2018.<\/p>\n Guns don\u2019t make kids shoot. Hate makes them shoot. Listen to people shouting about laws and calling for more guards and more psychologists and more counselors. Where is Jesus in the middle of it all? Can you hear anyone calling for Him? For more God?<\/p>\n Some of the \u201csimple\u201d solutions in next week\u2019s message.<\/p>\n + + +<\/p>\n
\nFor two centuries we have had virtually unrestricted access to firearms, and virtually no mass slayings and \u201csenseless\u201d attacks. Why?<\/em><\/p>\n