10-10-16<\/p>\n
This week an enormous storm brushed by the United States. It was a long time building, it moves deliberately, and forecasters say that it likely will circle around and hit again, causing even more distress and severe adjustments to a fearful population.<\/p>\n
In other news, Hurricane Matthew pummeled the East Coast. <\/p>\n
But back to the election campaign.<\/p>\n
The Election of 2016 is a plain illustration of how bankrupt our political system \u2013 our culture \u2013 is. A nation of a third of a billion people, and these two are the best we can do? Trump might be the \u201ccitizen politician\u201d that the Framers hoped for; but scarcely of the caliber they envisioned. He is a messenger: a mailman carrying the accumulated complaints of a restive population. Many people love him for it\u2026 understandably, for all his faults. It seems like everyone else has failed us.<\/p>\n
Hillary\u2019s rise \u2013 or, rather, her decades-long hovering presence \u2013 is disturbing evidence of our civic insolvency. Once again, a population as large (and, supposedly, as diverse and resourceful) as ours, and we lately subsist on dynasties? The Kennedy royalty? Bush \u2013 Clinton \u2013 Bush \u2013 Obama \u2013 maybe Clinton \/ almost another Bush \/ talk of Michelle Obama \/ Chelsea Clinton \/ George P Bush \/ \u2026 and more Kennedys being spawned? <\/p>\n
Incest. It results in mutants and defects, in politics as well as genetics.<\/p>\n
In this interminable campaign, Donald Trump has had more lives than a litter of cats. Part of his relative stability in the polls is his strong (and, to me, inexplicable) support from \u201cEvangelicals.\u201d Christians, following Christian celebrities, have chosen, endorsed, and largely remained loyal to, Donald Trump.<\/p>\n
His agenda, largely nationalist if not nativist, and generally in the tradition of economic royalists, Manchester Liberalism, and an America-First foreign policy \u2013 at the least the most recent iteration of his positions \u2013 is an agenda with which I generally am comfortable. Many conservative Christians feel the same way, at least manifested by an inchoate attraction.<\/p>\n
Trump has given voice, or more appropriately speaks with the same voice, as those of the Goldwater-Wallace-Agnew tremors across our political landscape in the \u201860s and \u201870s. Of the Reagan Revolution\u2019s foot-soldiers. Of the Tea Party insurgencies. Of the decentralization earthquakes in the Europe of Thatcher and UKIP and Brexit; the LePens in France; Geert Wilders in Holland; of anti-immigrant and nationalist movements in Germany, Italy, Austria, Spain, Hungary, Poland, Denmark, Switzerland, and elsewhere. <\/p>\n
He is not unique\u2026 except for his unique baggage. His \u201cevolving\u201d positions (for instance, on abortion) might be more encouraging than troubling. His boorish social skills might be overlooked by supporters who think there are many butts that need kicking here and abroad. <\/p>\n
That his morals, seemingly those of a pig, should surprise anybody is absurd.
\nLeast of all should Christians be startled by the words in the tape that recently surfaced. Like other supporters and politicians, some of whom are now abandoning ship, they should not be discomfited, because nothing new is on display. Merely a new soundbite.<\/p>\n
When James A Garfield was elected president, he left his position as an elder in his church, saying, \u201cI resign the highest office in the land to become president of the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n
In William McKinley\u2019s first inaugural address he said: \u201cOur faith teaches that there is no safer reliance than upon the God of our fathers, who has so singularly favored the American people in every national trial, and who will not forsake us so long as we obey His commandments and walk humbly in His footsteps.\u201d<\/p>\n
Is Trump or Hillary capable of saying, or believing, such words? Especially the \u201chumbly\u201d component? <\/p>\n
The real crisis in America is not deficient candidates. They are the symptoms, not the disease. To focus too much on these individuals is like a weatherman pointing to humidity levels in Arizona but ignoring Hurricane Matthew.<\/p>\n
Ah, back to the Hurricane. An act of God, so-called. Our political storms, however, are man-made. We get what deserve, and what we have constructed. The fault, dear Brutus, is not in the stars, but in ourselves that we are underlings. Look in our mirrors for the authors of this current mess. <\/p>\n
Meanwhile, Trump\u2019s major political sin is not what he bragged about doing on the tape; nor in being careless to speak when being recorded. To me the political<\/em> (that is, not only personal) sin was bragging, even fabricating, to a nobody. Trying to impress a Hollywood hack. Sounding like a wolf in cheap clothing. That<\/em> manner of discretion, that twisted sort of probity, is spoken by loose lips that sink ships. <\/p>\n To apologize \u201cto those who are offended\u201d is a weasel-worded deflection. To claim that Bill Clinton did worse things, or at a faster rate, is the very opposite of contrition; more jealousy than remorse. To condemn Hillary for persecuting Bill\u2019s mistresses and girlfriends is almost irrelevant, when Trump needs to reassure his supporters. To say that other world leaders (France, Italy, Russia) have had affairs, is a startling reversal of his attitude about foreign leaders. Those justifications are irresponsible efforts to distract people. It is an insult to his followers. It is cynical exploitation of the \u201cEvangelical\u201d \u201cleaders\u201d who support him.<\/p>\n Should Christians or patriots therefore abandon Trump and vote for Hillary? I think that the worst that can said about Trump \u2013 politics, integrity, probity \u2013 is insignificant compared to her resume, which is half sordid and half empty.<\/p>\n Is a third party (\u201cWhat\u2019s a Leppo?\u201d) or a write-in a viable option? I think that these are virtual ballots for Hillary. She will have enough dead voters, illegals, and multiple fraudulent ballots already.<\/p>\n Should Christian patriots \u201cgrow up\u201d and realize the world is \u201cthat way,\u201d as some friends who decry what they see as a self-defeating rise of Neo-Puritanism argue? Nonsense. Most of us are loath to accept \u201cthings as they are\u201d in any other sphere; political activism, even mere commentary, is (as Omar wrote) to smash the world to bits \u201cand then re-mold it nearer the heart\u2019s desire.\u201d <\/p>\n What should Christians do? I am asked this frequently, a month from Election Day.<\/p>\n Once upon a time, the president was a minor part of the campaign. The PLATFORM was what attracted, or repelled, voters. Vote for the representatives of the positions you favor<\/em>.<\/p>\n Myself, I think that if Hillary does everything she promises we are in a very bad place. If Trump fulfills only 25 per cent of his promises, we are in a much better place<\/em>.<\/p>\n