8-22-16<\/p>\n
There are many worldviews by which people live today, as there always has been in all societies. The difference in contemporary America, I think, is that the majority of citizens have no idea of what a worldview is, or whether or not they care about operating under any established and consistent precepts. <\/p>\n
Even Christians, including dedicated and fervent church-goers, often fail the test of worldview standards. Many Christians love God and believe in Jesus, but as if in the world but not of the world, know more what they oppose than what they should defend. As we recently noted, most people these days are not so much ignorant of history as indifferent to its relevance.<\/p>\n
In the political realm, partisans on the Left know their socialist and Marxist dogma, even if they reject the labels. On the Right, there are patriots who love liberty and know the Constitution. In the vast Middle, well-intentioned people are malleable, their opinions inevitably shaped less by events than by the media and the culture.<\/p>\n
This situation in America and the West was foretold by Aldous Huxley in a letter to George Orwell (both notable futurists and dystopian thinkers) in 1949: \u201cWithin the next generation I believe that the world’s leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than [sticks] and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Bible, inevitably, put the same thought \u2013 the same prediction \u2013 most clearly: \u201cThe time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables\u201d (II Timothy 4: 3-4). Indeed, we love our servitude.<\/p>\n
Counted among those \u201cteachers\u201d are not only members of the educational-industrial complex, but also politicians, role-models from popular culture, and\u2026 \u201cpeople of the cloth\u201d \u2013 ministers, preachers, priests, rabbis.<\/p>\n
I am pessimistic about the future of American civilization (as well as of our \u201cdemocracy,\u201d republic, and government) because we are the inheritors of at least 500 years of a corrupted worldview. The worst aspects of a cultural secularization were unlikely to have coexisted with theocentric virtue. America was a \u201clast best hope\u201d of mankind, not for democracy\u2019s sake \u2013 never an ideal of the Founders and Framers \u2013 but of a virtuous society. Respect, self-respect, order, justice, charity: these were among the characteristics recommended, and recognized, by Pilgrims and Great Revivalists; by our civic architects like John Adams and James Madison; by admiring observers like Alexis de Tocqueville, who retained enough equanimity to state: \u201cWhen America ceases to be good, she will cease being great.\u201d<\/p>\n
One of the infections of the half-millennium cited above is the belief in progress, a hallmark of the Modern Age. Most Americans will think my definition, and certainly my analysis, is loopy. But that shows how pervasive this worldview has become. Earlier societies and civilizations, however, neither believed in the inevitability of human progress nor its efficacy, if they thought much about it at all. <\/p>\n
Inherent in the concept of progress, and history\u2019s plodding march \u201cforward,\u201d is perfectibility. Once that belief is subscribed (and we have made a fetish of it in the West), then it naturally follows that laws can be passed, rules enforced, behavior modified, all to achieve perfection. In society; in individuals. Justice. Heaven on earth. Utopia.<\/p>\n
Of course, this leads not to progress but to schemes, warring factions, and, for example, the parade of monsters of the past century who consigned millions to servitude and battlefield slaughters. Secularism, the glorification of Self, will do that. Human nature without its restraints reveals the worst, not the putative best, aspects. We have arrived at the 21st century thinking we know better than all societies, in all of history \u2013 better than the Word of God \u2013 about the structure of the family, the role of authority, the sanctity of life, and a host of such truths. Gosh, we\u2019re great. <\/p>\n
I cannot decry progress in certain areas by certain characterizations. My late wife, a diabetic since the age of 13, would not have had a 14th birthday party if not for medical science. I could not be enjoying Bach as I type a message that (still magically, to me) will be read by thousands of people. I am not an all-in Luddite.<\/p>\n
But our conceited conviction that, quoting Dr Pangloss from Voltaire\u2019s \u201cCandide,\u201d this is the best of all possible worlds, is as self-swindling and ridiculous as, well, Pangloss himself. It might just be the case that the world will never host a greater philosopher than Plato; no better sculptors than Michelangelo and Rodin; no better composers than Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven. The works of Rodin and the Viennese masters do not vitiate my point, but encourage us always to create and emulate. Not be perfect, because only God is perfect; but to create as He inspires us to be creative. (I mention Rodin, having last week stood in awe before sculptures in the Rodin Museum\u2026)<\/p>\n
The most pernicious effect of this modern malady is that we humans make a god of perfectibility: to the extent we can think, innovate, reform, and devise according to a faith in Progress, we commensurately surrender faith in God. We have replaced it with a faith in humanistic progress, in humankind\u2019s perfectibility, in our selves. <\/p>\n
Foolish us, we are doomed to fail. If you can lift your gaze from the muck \u2013 the bread and circuses as well as the disintegration of our social fabric \u2013 you will see how well the seduction of Progress\u2019s inevitability and modern definition is working.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served\u2026 or the gods\u2026 in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord\u201d (Joshua 24:15).<\/p>\n
+ + +<\/p>\n