10-27-14<\/p>\n
This is Reformation Week, commemorating the traditional date of October 31, when the Augustinian monk Martin Luther nailed 95 theses \u2013 point-by-point criticisms of contemporary Roman Catholic practices \u2013 onto the wooden door of Wittenberg Cathedral in Germany. All throughout northern Europe, churches were the centers of each town\u2019s social, as well as spiritual, life, and their doors were the precursors of our day\u2019s \u201cpostings to your wall.\u201d<\/p>\n
Everyone in the town square saw Luther\u2019s manifesto. It was not startling except, perhaps, for its formality and audacity. But Luther had been complaining about practices in the Church for some time: corruption in its operation, committing errors in doctrine. And so had many others complained. In other German cities and states. And in Switzerland. And the Netherlands. In northern Italy. Even a hundred years earlier, when a dissident Moravian priest, Jan Hus, was burned at the stake. I have stood in reverence before his statue in Prague\u2019s Old Town Square. And even before Hus, one who protested the ethical and doctrinal corruption in Rome: John Wycliffe, of England. One of his \u201ccrimes\u201d was translating the Bible into English (the \u201clanguage of the people,\u201d instead of Latin), as Luther later dared to do with his German translation.<\/p>\n
For all the brewing opposition to the Vatican, the Reformation, if not Reformed theology, is popularly regarded as having begun with Luther, and specifically on that day in 1517 when he nailed those 95 indictments to the church door. That is because a dam burst, metaphorically, in the Catholic Church, in larger Christendom, in society, in politics, in the arts, on all cultural levels. Half the German princes opposed the Pope\u2019s political and military prerogatives, as well as papal ecclesiastical authority. After Hus\u2019s martyrdom, major social upheavals led to Bohemia soon becoming 90 per cent Hussite (today\u2019s Moravian church) or other variety of Protestant.<\/p>\n
So the 95 Theses were the spark that lit a bonfire, but there were burning embers and brushfires aplenty for two centuries previous. Also, the times were right for a revolution like the Reformation. Rome\u2019s corruption was outrageous; extra-biblical doctrines were offending the pious; and, hand-in-hand with the ideas behind the Renaissance, men were learning to think for themselves. And act for themselves; and organize, and trade, and read, for themselves. Literacy: a few centuries earlier, Luther\u2019s manifesto would have a been a paper with meaningless scribbles to passersby. On that Sunday, however, the theses were read, and devoured, and discussed. The Pope was furious when he was told that Luther\u2019s tracts were best-sellers of the day in Germany.<\/p>\n
It is frankly the case that the revolution that Luther sparked was not fully intended by him. He did not want to break away from the Catholic Church, least of all have a denomination named for him. He scolded his followers who stormed Catholic churches and knocked over statues (\u201cidols,\u201d to them). But\u2026 he was excommunicated. For a time he was hidden by protectors because the Church wanted him dead. He married a former nun, settled into a life of preaching and writing (many volumes!) and preaching \u201csola Scriptura\u201d (Scripture Alone) as the basis for faith, and for salvation.<\/p>\n
His era\u2019s handmaidens, Renaissance thought, humanism, and neo-Classicism, were not particularly welcome movements to Martin Luther. If anything he was closer to Orthodoxy, at least in rejecting \u201cmodern\u201d trends in theology. He went so far as to say that \u201cReason is the enemy of Faith.\u201d Remember, he relied on \u201cScripture Alone.\u201d Ironically, he was especially venerated during the Enlightenment because (despite some history books claiming the period to be one of liberation from the Bible) Newton and others saw scientific discoveries as explaining God, not marginalizing Him. So Luther, father of the Reformation, was not the first of the Moderns, but the last of the Medievalists.<\/p>\n
In spite of Luther \u2013 or, rather, an inevitable component of the Protestant Reformation \u2013 social and political freedoms were unleashed. Literacy spread, and as people split from the church they increasingly asserted their civil rights too. In a very real sense, we can say for convenience\u2019s sake if not dramatic effect, that Western civilization was one way before Oct 31, 1517; and another way afterward. With Martin Luther, formally, on that day, began the battle of the individual against authority, the primacy of conscience over arbitrary regulations.<\/p>\n
Those battles continue, of course. But blessings flowered\u2026 and malignant seeds sprouted too. Democracy has led to social disruption and near-anarchic relations between classes and nations. With broken ecclesiastic authority, public morality has degenerated. And as denominations have multiplied, their influence has virtually evaporated in Western culture and in the United States. <\/p>\n
It can be said \u2013 and has been said, frequently \u2013 that the Roman Catholic Church brought the Reformation onto itself. Perhaps (for instance) some of the mistresses and illegitimate children of Popes would have a say in that discussion. The widespread device of selling \u201cindulgences\u201d still stands as a major offense: common people were persuaded to pay money to guarantee that their dead ancestors would be delivered from torture in Purgatory (despite the fact the Bible does not say that we can have influence of the souls of the departed\u2026 or even that there is such a place as Purgatory). Yet an enterprising priest, Tetzel, invented a rhyme, \u201cWhen a coin in the coffer rings, a soul from Purgatory springs.\u201d Much of this was a scheme to build and decorate St Peter\u2019s in Rome. Clever venture capitalism, bold entrepreneurial management, perhaps; but rotten theology.<\/p>\n
Very specifically, these vile offenses confronted Luther when he travelled on foot from Germany to the Holy See on a mission. He was aghast at the corruption, decadence, sin, money-grubbing, and countless heresies \u2013 not in the city of Rome, but in the Vatican itself. A biographer of Luther wrote, \u201cthe city, which he had greeted [from afar] as holy, was a sink of iniquity; its very priests were openly infidel and scoffed at the services they performed; the papal courtiers were men of the most shameless lives.\u201d <\/p>\n
Let me fast-forward 500 years, and let us ourselves enter the Holy See of Protestantism (as it were) and assess what Reform has brought to the Church of Jesus Christ, those portions of the Body. <\/p>\n
Do we see denominations inventing and \u201cdiscovering\u201d their own doctrines? Do we see churches bending their theology in order to fill the pews? Do we see widespread moral failings in the clergy \u2013 everything from pedophilia to homosexual encounters? Do we see story after story in the news about financial shenanigans? How many churches wallow in obscene opulence, as the poor live in their shadows? How many charities are shams; how many mission outreaches, we learn with sad hearts, are looted? How often are \u201cmodern\u201d sins excused by the heretical lies of relativism in the church? How have seminaries become breeding-grounds of Progressivism; why are entire denominations denying the divinity of Christ, the existence of Absolute Truth? What is this extra-biblical \u201cProsperity Gospel\u201d? \u2013 when preachers procure \u201cseed-faith\u201d offerings, and offer \u201cprayer hankies\u201d to customers who are assured of God\u2019s blessings \u2013 HOW is that different from selling indulgences?<\/p>\n
Racing through that list, you will recognize problems that are endemic to this or that denomination; sometimes still the Catholic church; mainstream or evangelical Protestants; Pentecostal or post-modern; \u201cSeeker\u201d or emergent. I believe that the Christian churches of contemporary Europe and America might grieve the Heart of God no less than the corrupt Church of the Popes 500 years ago.<\/p>\n
We need a New Reformation. We need \u201cScripture Alone\u201d as our guide again. We need holy indignation from the remnant of faithful followers of Jesus Christ. <\/p>\n
I intend to compose a New 95 Theses (knowing that a list of problems with today\u2019s churches could be a larger number!). I will be writing more, as I compose this, but as I look for hammer and nails to post them, or publish them, I invite readers to nominate some of the practices in today\u2019s churches that need reforming. We ARE Christ\u2019s representatives here on earth; and a royal priesthood of believers. We have a responsibility. And let us be guided by Martin Luther, in one of the greatest moments of human history. Hauled before a court of the Holy Roman Empire, condemned by the Pope himself, threatened with excommunication and death, ordered to renounce his thoughts and denounce his books and sermons\u2026 nevertheless he was defiant in opposition: \u201cHere I stand. I can do no other. God help me.\u201d<\/p>\n
A mighty fortress is our God.<\/p>\n
+ + +<\/p>\n
Two clips this week. The first is the dramatic confrontation, and Luther\u2019s dramatic defense, at the Council in Worms, Germany, that presumed to judge him. From the classic black-and-white, award-winning biopic starring Niall MacGinnis. The second clip is a signature performance, a cappella, by Steve Green, singing “A Mighty Fortress” before thousands. \u201cLet goods and kindred go, This mortal life also; The body they may kill: God\u2019s truth abideth still, His Kingdom is forever!\u201d<\/p>\n
Click: \u201cHere I stand\u201d: Luther\u2019s defense<\/a><\/p>\n