6-16-14 <\/p>\n
The Pledge of Allegiance added the phrase \u201cunder God\u201d in 1954, on Flag Day \u2013 60 years ago this week. So Happy Birthday\u2026 not to God, but to the phrase. Its inclusion has been a matter of some discussion since it was appended. <\/p>\n
Theodore Roosevelt was criticized during his presidency for wanting to take \u201cIn God We Trust\u201d off American currency. This seems counterintuitive about the man I have elsewhere called possibly the most observant if not the most intensely Christian of our presidents. One of his missions was to reform and beautify American coinage, and his friend Augustus St-Gaudens in fact designed the most impressive coins in our history, the $20 \u201cDouble Eagle\u201d gold piece, and the $10 \u201cIndian Head\u201d gold eagle.<\/p>\n
Why did TR want \u201cIn God We Trust\u201d off our coinage? In fact, he considered it irreverent, making a cheap slogan of a sacred matter. He said he was witness, in his rancher days in the Bad Lands, to cowboys in saloons citing it coarsely; \u201cIn God we trust \u2013 all others pay cash,\u201d and so forth. \u201cMy own feeling in the matter is due to my very firm conviction that to put such a motto on coins, or to use it in any kindred manner, not only does no good but does positive harm, and is in effect irreverence, which comes dangerously close to sacrilege,\u201d he wrote. <\/p>\n
\u201cIt is a motto which it is indeed well to have inscribed on our great national monuments, in our temples of justice, in our legislative halls, and in buildings such as those at West Point and Annapolis \u2013 in short, wherever it will tend to arouse and inspire a lofty emotion in those who look thereon. But it seems to me eminently unwise to cheapen such a motto by use on coins, just as it would be to cheapen it by use on postage stamps, or in advertisements.\u201d<\/p>\n
His view did not prevail; an aroused public and Congress overcame his objection. A similar groundswell of popular support added \u201cunder God\u201d to the Pledge 60 years ago. Anent both matters, debates have not merely continued but intensified of late.<\/p>\n
I am generally of the Theodore Roosevelt school regarding the nation\u2019s confirmation of belief on public buildings, monuments, courtrooms, and legislative halls. It is a matter as much of tradition as of faith. Commonly, societies tend to codify their basic tenets by such means \u2013 dispositive acts like public prayers, and displays of the Decalogue in public squares. I understand TR\u2019s disinclination to have a sacred concept coarsened \u2013 but I would take that chance, trusting to peoples\u2019 eventual conviction. And simply asserting universal, foundational, shared beliefs. After all, dumb jokes are occasionally made about \u201ce pluribus unum.\u201d<\/p>\n
Further, myself, I would proceed on such matters to avow in every pertinent manner that the United States were settled as Christian communities; that Founders and Framers alike cited biblical principles and reliance on God; that the Supreme Court formally declared the United States of America a \u201cChristian country.\u201d This is no knock on Jews or Muslims or atheists, who are guaranteed every legal right the majority enjoys. But if I moved to Israel, I would never think of agitating, say, to have the Star of David removed the nation\u2019s flag because I would be \u201coffended\u201d as a minority. If I moved to an Islamic society I would be embarrassed to attempt to eliminate Muslim symbols, traditions, and observances, simply because I as a newcomer had a pulse and \u201cfeelings.\u201d<\/p>\n
But\u2026 genii are out of the bottles in America. So debates rage, Christians are on the defensive, and traditions are upended. I believe this is due as much to the moral lassitude of Christians as to the aggressive pursuits of rampaging lawyers. Shame on us.<\/p>\n
It has become easier to insist on the retention of slogans on currency, phrases in pledges, and crosses in cemeteries, than to be bloodied in the dusty arena of ideas. Ultimately, the real, burning question for Christians in 2014 is this: what exactly are we defending in these debates? What in hell \u2013 I choose my words carefully \u2013 are we really supporting in contemporary America? <\/p>\n
\u201cIn God We Trust.\u201d Oh, yeah? Then why have we allowed a runaway government to be our primary source of security in life? Why not God? Why not each other? Why not ourselves?<\/p>\n
\u201cIn God We Trust.\u201d Oh, yeah? Then why have we, as a culture, turned from biblical ways of finding comfort in God, and bowed to drugs, drink, decadent entertainment, and false gods of pleasure?<\/p>\n
\u201cIn God We Trust.\u201d Oh, yeah? Then how has America suddenly transformed itself from a traditionalist society of manners and morals to a country awash in abortions, addictions, physical abuse, divorce, illegitimate births, and myriad sexually transmitted diseases?<\/p>\n
\u201cIn God We Trust.\u201d Oh, yeah? Then why have traditional expressions of faith been banished in favor of secular concepts and moral relativism? Legislators and judges sit in halls with \u201cIn God We Trust\u201d on their walls, and open their sessions with prayer \u2013 yet day by day, now, they mock that very pledge. In hypocrisy we trust.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn God We Trust.\u201d Oh, yeah? As a people? Then why do our movies, TV shows, pop-music lyrics, literature, graphic novels, political discourse, judicial decisions, and bureaucratic rules dedicate themselves to be, not \u201cneutral,\u201d but hostile, toward God and His Revealed Word?<\/p>\n
\u201cIn God We Trust.\u201d Oh, yeah? America is America \u2013 the essence of the misunderstood term \u201cExceptionalism\u201d \u2013 because a diverse group of peoples came here through the centuries, disparate in uncountable ways, but spiritually unified, somehow: United, before the fact, in trusting God, being suspicious of authority, loving liberty, embracing tradition, reliant on selves, and therefore \u2013 yes, part of American Exceptionalism too \u2013 loving their neighbors.<\/p>\n
Is the next chapter of the American story to be entitled, \u201cIn God We Once Trusted\u201d? <\/p>\n
+ + +<\/p>\n
Since we are discussing traditions, our musical video for this message is \u201cNearer, My God, To Thee,\u201d an old hymn sung here in Sacred Harp fashion. This is a purely American musical expression that took root centuries ago in rural areas and the South, where instruments and musical literacy alike were once scarce. The hymns were sung a capella; out of books with \u201cshape notes\u201d; often sung with the musical terms Do, Re Me Fa, So, La, Ti, Do corresponding to the notes; then followed by lyrics of the hymns; singers arranged in a square, with a leader in the \u201chollow\u201d; forceful vocals (a euphemism for joyously loud!); emphasis on four-part harmony; arm gestures that emphasized the rhythm; often, strong foot-tapping to carry the beat; a large number of standard hymns in the songbooks, often identified by their numbers instead of titles or first lines. <\/p>\n
These exuberant, evangelical, exhortations almost died out until recently. Now they are being revived in churches and \u2013 God works in mysterious ways \u2013 in secular shape-note and Sacred Harp groups in the North, in urban centers, among (not yet) religious singers, singing conventions, and in more than a few European communities too. Here, an amateur video at Mount Pisgah Primitive Baptist Church in Stroud, Alabama, few years ago. <\/p>\n