1-13-14<\/p>\n
The recent comments about capitalism and socialism by Pope Francis \u2013 although he never used the terms \u2013 probably excited more interest than the many other topics of his lengthy Apostolic Exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium. A new pope, especially history\u2019s first from south of the Equator and from the Western hemisphere, will have theologians and the laity alike looking for tea leaves to read.<\/p>\n
A religious leader\u2019s predictable censure of materialism was heightened by sharp condemnation of secularism and relativism in today\u2019s world. But he went steps further, with several and specific denunciations of capitalism, free-market finances, and even \u201ctrickle-down\u201d economics by name. Some commentators and apologists (that is, those who advance Christian apologetics) have claimed that selected passages were taken out of context, that the Pope condemned socialism and collectivism elsewhere with equal reproach.<\/p>\n
In fact this is not the case. His harshest words for totalitarian governments were directed against persecution of Christians, and relatively few words of that. Little about suppression of rights and basic liberties around the world, even in some countries where the Catholic Church predominates. As a non-Catholic and as a basic free-marketeer (but not a capitalist, a distinction I make because prefixes like \u201ccorporate-\u201d and \u201ccrony-\u201d too often are endemic these days), I come neither to bury nor praise Francis, but to consider his comments about wealth. It would do us all well.<\/p>\n
In Point 54, Francis wrote: \u201c\u2026some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and na\u00efve trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the\u2026 workings of the prevailing economic system. Meanwhile, the excluded are still waiting.\u201d From this, not only capitalists but statisticians can dissent. While the poor we still have with us, more souls have been lifted from poverty by the prescriptions of Adam Smith than any other system: surely more than have benefited from Karl Marx. <\/p>\n
Later, in Point 56, he continued: \u201c[Economic] imbalance is the result of ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation. Consequently, [some people] reject the right of states, charged with vigilance for the common good, to exercise any form of control.\u201d <\/p>\n
I suggest that Francis confine his Absolutes to the areas of morality and theology. There are no countries in the world, and virtually no political economists, who advocate \u201cabsolute autonomy\u201d of the marketplace or \u201cany form of control.\u201d Some ideologies might pay lip service to such theories, but in reality even the most extreme libertarians compromise on myriad points.<\/p>\n
So we have the Pope\u2019s words as one of our culture\u2019s periodic talking-points. My own talking point, just stated, is that the lack of balance he displayed about world economics does not mean that the critiques on the heavier side of his scale are not correct.<\/p>\n
It is accurate, as he wrote, that materialism has tended to create a \u201cglobalization of indifference\u201d where the prosperous are \u201cincapable of feeling compassion at the outcry of the poor, weeping for other people\u2019s pain, and feeling a need to help them.\u201d I don\u2019t think the logical extension of this observation \u2013 whose remedies are, after all, as old as any commands in scripture \u2013 is to advocate governments and economic systems that co-opt Christian charity. Can we not let free people grow their prosperity freely, and governments cease micro-managing\u2026 which has evolved to include managing the work of churches and the charitable work of individuals? Not to mention having become everyone\u2019s Conscience Police and Compassion Monitors?<\/p>\n
In the meantime, we do have a moral crisis, not just an economic crisis, in the United States. We rot from within because of false values, overweening materialism, and deadened consciences. Pope Francis can stand behind me, no one ahead of me, in this line of criticism. The problem is as old as human nature, and is not capitalism per se \u2013 money — but, as the Bible specifies, the LOVE of money. It is the root of all evil. It is difficult not to notice, by the way, that despite press-agentry about the Pope\u2019s decision to live in less opulent sleeping quarters, and wear simpler vestments, that the jewel-encrusted aspects of the Vatican \u2013 thrones, crowns, rings \u2013 contradict his words. He is neither the first pope nor the first human being to hunt for sawdust in the eyes of others: <\/p>\n
\u201cAnd why worry about a speck in your friend\u2019s eye when you have a log in your own?\u00a0How can you think of saying to your friend, \u2018Let me help you get rid of that speck in your eye,\u2019 when you can\u2019t see past the log in your own eye?\u00a0Hypocrite! First get rid of the log in your own eye; then you will see well enough to deal with the speck in your friend\u2019s eye\u201d (Jesus quoted in Matt. 7: 3-5 NLT).<\/p>\n
But we all are awash in contradictions, and we seldom feel the need to set the course straight. Francis made some wise observations. I am praying that he is saving fusillades against totalitarian governments and repressive \u201cplanned economies\u201d for a future encyclical. For surely, in this world there are crises of hearts and minds, not only stomachs. In the meantime, there are places to look to start solving this crisis from which we all may be infected. We look to moral leaders; we look to the Bible. <\/p>\n
And we can look around us. Even comedians and singers, wise in their way, have characterized our moral predicament in simple terms: Do we just have too much stuff?<\/p>\n
+ + +<\/p>\n
The comedian George Carlin, not exactly a Prophet Jeremiah, nevertheless made some sensible observations about \u201cstuff\u201d in a famous routine. Recently the singer Delbert McClinton, with Lyle Lovett and John Prine, put the observation to music. Zeppo\u2019s slideshow is money\u2026 er, classic. When opening the link, if prompted to click \u201cYouTube,\u201d do so to open the vid. <\/p>\n